BORDONABA PLOU, LAURA
18 relatos componen este primer libro de la novel escritora zaragozana. Relatos con una prosa muy lírica, cuidada, y plagados de personajes que de alguna manera están a la búsqueda de completarse. Ausencias conocidas y desconocidas, abandonos y ciudades que de alguna manera forman parte de esa herida. Historias donde tiene cabida el misterio, la oscuridad y la tensión entre la belleza y el dolor, pero siempre dejando paso a esa luz de la que el título quiere ser un canto consciente. Como en esas fotografías veladas, los lectores intuyen e imaginan, más que a veces encuentran, los motivos y los impulsos de esos personajes que aunque inventados son reales. Pasajeros de esta vida nuestra, gente que camina cada mañana a nuestro alrededor y que sólo hay que descubrir.
This book contains a job that was essential to make because the similar existing studies have significant limitations that are now successfully overcome. The most important of these works is Nicolini & D'Amico, Indices corporis iuris civilis iuxta vetustiores editiones cum criticis collatas, 5 vols., Milán, 1964-1967, which although praiseworthy in some aspects, not only ignores entirely the Greek apparatus of Digest (which therefore can not be accessed) but also more than five hundred Latin texts are, for various reasons, missing. It uses with a blind automatism the initia of the vulgate of Hugo a Porta of 1551 (D. novum), 1552 (Infortiatum) and 1560 (D. Vetus) with the serious consequence that the citations of the “laws” made according to the lectio florentina will not be found in the index of Nicolini, although something different happens with the paragraphs. Another similar and relevant work is Ochoa & Diez, Indices titulorum et legum Corporis iuris civilis, Roma, 1965, in which absolutely all the paragraphs are missing, that is, more than half of the texts of the Digest. Finally, the traditional, albeit limited and very defective, Index omnium legum et paragraphorum quae in Pandectis, Codice et Instit. continentur, per literas Digestus, Lugduni, apud Gulielmum Rouvilium, 1571, is practically useless or, if you prefer to quote Kantorowicz, "ist selten".
This book contains a job that was essential to make because the similar existing studies have significant limitations that are now successfully overcome. The most important of these works is Nicolini & D'Amico, Indices corporis iuris civilis iuxta vetustiores editiones cum criticis collatas, 5 vols., Milán, 1964-1967, which although praiseworthy in some aspects, not only ignores entirely the Greek apparatus of Digest (which therefore can not be accessed) but also more than five hundred Latin texts are, for various reasons, missing. It uses with a blind automatism the initia of the vulgate of Hugo a Porta of 1551 (D. novum), 1552 (Infortiatum) and 1560 (D. Vetus) with the serious consequence that the citations of the “laws” made according to the lectio florentina will not be found in the index of Nicolini, although something different happens with the paragraphs. Another similar and relevant work is Ochoa & Diez, Indices titulorum et legum Corporis iuris civilis, Roma, 1965, in which absolutely all the paragraphs are missing, that is, more than half of the texts of the Digest. Finally, the traditional, albeit limited and very defective, Index omnium legum et paragraphorum quae in Pandectis, Codice et Instit. continentur, per literas Digestus, Lugduni, apud Gulielmum Rouvilium, 1571, is practically useless or, if you prefer to quote Kantorowicz, "ist selten".
